Revvy LearnEdexcel International A-LevelBusiness / Model answersOpen the app
← Unit 2: Managing Business Activities

Managing Finance — Exam Questions & Model Answers

Section 2.3.3 — Annotated model answers for liquidity, cash flow management, and the cash flow vs. profit debate.

Business · WBS12 · Unit 2 · 2.3.3

Exam questions

Every question here carries a tariff that exists in IAL Business. Open the mark scheme before the model answer and you will see what the examiner is paid to look for.

  1. Explain4 marksAO1 · AO26 min

    Explain what is meant by liquidity and why it is important to a business.

    Mark scheme
    1–2 marks
    Definition of liquidity (ability to meet short-term debts / convert assets to cash)
    3–4 marks
    Application showing why liquidity matters (paying suppliers, wages, avoiding insolvency)
    Model answer — 4 / 4
    What the marks in the margin meanKKnowledge/DefinitionAApplication
    Liquidity refers to a business's ability to meet its short-term financial obligations as they fall due. K It can also refer to how easily an asset can be converted into cash without significant loss of value — cash is the most liquid asset, while property is relatively illiquid. K

    Liquidity is crucial because even a profitable business can fail if it cannot pay its bills on time. A A business must have sufficient cash or near-cash assets to cover day-to-day expenses such as supplier invoices, wages, rent, and loan repayments. If it cannot, suppliers may refuse to deliver, staff may leave, and creditors may take legal action — potentially forcing the business into insolvency. A
    Examiner commentary
    The key distinction examiners look for is that profit and liquidity are not the same thing. A business can be profitable on paper but cash-poor in practice. Mentioning this explicitly earns top marks.
  2. Discuss8 marksAO1 · AO2 · AO3 · AO412 min

    Discuss how a business might improve its cash flow position.

    Mark scheme
    Discuss (8)
    Appendix 6: Requires a logical chains of reasoning, in context, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s). A brief assessment is required showing an awareness of competing arguments/factors.
    Level 1 — 1–2 marks
    Isolated knowledge. Not set in the context of the business and no chain of reasoning.
    Level 2 — 3–4 marks
    Knowledge used in the context of the business. A cause is identified but the chain is not carried through to an effect.
    Level 3 — 5–6 marks
    A logical chain of reasoning in context showing cause and effect. No awareness of competing arguments or factors.
    Level 4 — 7–8 marks
    A logical chain of reasoning in context showing cause(s) and effect(s) AND a brief assessment showing awareness of competing arguments or factors — the clause that separates Discuss from Analyse.
    Indicative content
    Knowledge of cash flow (inflows and outflows of cash over time). Application of specific methods to improve cash flow. Developed analysis of how each method works and its potential drawbacks.
    Model answer — 7–8 / 8
    What the marks in the margin meanKKnowledge/DefinitionAApplicationAnAnalysis
    Cash flow is the movement of money into and out of a business over a given period. A business improves its cash flow by increasing inflows, reducing outflows, or improving the timing of both. K

    One approach is to reduce credit terms offered to customers — for example, changing from 60-day to 30-day payment terms. A This accelerates cash inflows, but risks losing customers who prefer longer credit periods, particularly in B2B markets where extended credit is standard practice. An

    A business could also negotiate longer payment terms with suppliers, delaying cash outflows. A This effectively uses the supplier as a source of free short-term finance. However, this may damage the relationship with suppliers, who might respond by increasing prices or prioritising other customers' orders. An

    Another method is sale and leaseback of assets — selling owned assets (e.g. vehicles, property) and leasing them back. A This provides an immediate cash injection but creates an ongoing lease expense that increases costs in the long run. The business also loses the asset from its balance sheet, which may affect its ability to secure future loans using those assets as collateral. An
    Examiner commentary
    Three methods, each developed to a consequence rather than named. Level 4 is earned because every one carries its own counterweight: shorter credit terms against the customers they cost, longer supplier terms against the relationship they damage, sale and leaseback against the ongoing lease charge and the collateral surrendered. Three trade-offs made explicitly is the brief assessment Discuss requires.
  3. Evaluate20 marksAO1 · AO2 · AO3 · AO430 min

    Evaluate the view that cash flow is more important than profit for the survival of a business.

    Mark scheme
    AO1 (4 marks)
    Knowledge of cash flow, profit, working capital, and insolvency
    AO2 (4 marks)
    Application — named business examples, data on business failure
    AO3 (6 marks)
    Analysis — why profitable firms can fail, why loss-making firms can survive
    AO4 (6 marks)
    Evaluation — depends on time horizon, business stage, and industry
    Model answer — 18–20 / 20
    What the marks in the margin meanKKnowledgeAApplicationAnAnalysis chain

    Introduction

    Cash flow is the movement of money into and out of a business over a period. Profit is the difference between total revenue and total costs. K While related, they are fundamentally different — a business can be profitable but cash-poor (or loss-making but cash-rich) depending on the timing of payments and receipts. An

    Argument 1 — Cash flow is more important for survival

    In the short run, cash flow is critical for survival because businesses must pay wages, suppliers, rent, and loan repayments on time, regardless of their profit position. An Carillion, the UK's second-largest construction firm, was reporting profits until months before its collapse in January 2018 — but its operating cash flow was deeply negative, and it could not pay its 30,000 suppliers. A A business that runs out of cash becomes insolvent — it cannot meet its liabilities as they fall due, and creditors may force it into administration. An This is especially common for fast-growing firms that offer long credit terms to customers — they have made the sale (profit) but not yet received the cash. An

    Counter-argument — Profit matters in the long run

    However, long-term profitability is essential for sustainability. A business can manage short-term cash flow problems through overdrafts, credit lines, or selling assets, but it cannot survive indefinitely without generating profit. An Amazon operated at a loss for years while building market share and infrastructure — investors accepted this because they believed future profits would materialise. A Without the expectation of eventual profitability, no investor or lender would provide the cash flow support needed. Profit is also needed to fund investment, repay debt, and reward shareholders. An

    Evaluation

    The relative importance depends on the stage of the business and the time horizon. An For a start-up, cash flow is the immediate priority — many new businesses fail not because their idea is bad but because they run out of cash before revenue materialises. An For a mature business, sustained profitability matters more — the firm needs to generate returns for shareholders and fund long-term growth. The industry also matters — construction and retail (with long payment cycles) face greater cash flow risk than subscription businesses (with predictable monthly revenue). An

    Conclusion

    On balance, cash flow is more important for short-term survival — a profitable business that cannot pay its bills will fail, while a loss-making business with strong cash flow can survive and adapt. However, profit is more important for long-term viability, as it is the ultimate source of the cash flow needed for growth and investment. The most dangerous position is when a business mistakes profit for financial health while ignoring its cash position — as Carillion demonstrated. An
    Examiner commentary
    Excellent answer. The Carillion case study is perfectly chosen — profitable on paper, collapsed due to cash flow. Amazon provides the counter-example (loss-making but cash-supported). The evaluation distinguishes by business stage and industry, which is the contextual depth examiners reward. The conclusion's final sentence is powerful and memorable.