Marketing Mix and Strategy
Unit 1: Marketing and People
Marketing Mix and Strategy
FREE RESOURCES
EXAM RESOURCES
WorksheetsComing soon
PREMIUM
A marketing objective is a target for what the marketing is meant to achieve, stated so plainly that the business can tell afterwards whether it hit it.
A marketing objective is a goal the business sets for its marketing: something it wants to be true at the end of a period that is not true now. "Sell more" is not one, because two people can disagree about whether it happened. "Reach 15% of the bottles bought in the region by the end of next year" is one, because they cannot.
The specification names three marketing objectives, and this chapter takes one subsection each: increase market share, increase revenue, and building a brand. They are separate targets, and the rest of this chapter shows that they do not point at the same price.
Zola sells its bottle at $20 and shifts 60,000 a year. Buyers in its region take 500,000 bottles a year in total, from every maker together. One bottle costs Zola $8 to make. Every figure in this section comes from those four numbers.
Real Example: A drinks brand that says it wants to "grow awareness" cannot tell at the year end whether it succeeded. One that says it wants to be stocked by a named number of retailers can, and can say who is accountable for it.
Exam Matters: A Define (2 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires you to define the term. For a marketing objective that means naming it as a target for marketing AND saying it is measurable — a definition with only the first half is half a definition.
Market share is the business's own sales as a percentage of the whole market's, so it rises only by taking bottles from a rival or by growing faster than the market does.
Market share is what fraction of everything bought in a market comes from this business. It is a percentage, and it is worked out the same way every time:
Share is a relative measure, and that is what makes it a demanding objective: Zola can sell more bottles than last year and still lose share, if every rival grew faster. Cutting the price is the direct route — at $12 Zola would sell 100,000 bottles, which is 20% of the market — but the next two subsections show what that costs.
Real Example: A phone maker that reports record sales in a year when the whole market grew faster has lost market share. Both statements are true at once, which is why a business tracks the share as well as the count.
Exam Matters: A Calculate (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires you to perform a calculation based on given data, and says workings should be given. For a market share that means showing the division as well as the percentage.
Revenue is price multiplied by quantity, so a price cut that wins share can leave revenue lower — the two objectives are not the same objective.
Revenue is the money the sales bring in: the price multiplied by the number sold. Nothing is taken off it — costs come later, and revenue is the top line rather than what the business keeps.
This is where the first two objectives come apart. Zola's sales at each price, its share, and the revenue each price brings:
Read the two columns against each other. Market share is largest at the lowest price and falls all the way up. Revenue does not: it rises to $16 and falls again, so $16 is the revenue-maximising price while the share-maximising price is the lowest one Zola will go to. A business chasing share and a business chasing revenue set different prices, and a business that has not said which it is chasing cannot price at all.
Note the $12 and $20 rows: the same revenue, $1,200,000, from 100,000 bottles or from 60,000. Revenue alone cannot tell those two businesses apart.
Real Example: A cinema chain that discounts heavily on a quiet weekday fills more seats and takes less money than it would have at the full price. Whether that is a good decision depends on which objective it set.
Exam Matters: An Explain (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a brief explanation of cause or effect supported by details or examples. A price cut raising share while lowering revenue is a cause and an effect, and the figures are the detail.
Building a brand is an objective in its own right because a brand changes what the business can charge, which is why it is worth spending on before it pays.
The third objective the specification names is building a brand. It sits oddly beside the other two at first: share and revenue are numbers this year, and a brand is built over several. That is the point of naming it separately — it is the objective a business pursues when it is willing to give up something now for what the brand lets it do later.
What a brand does is change the shape of demand rather than its level. A well-built brand does not necessarily sell more bottles today at $20; what it changes is how many Zola loses when it raises the price. Block 5 works that pivot out with the figures, and shows the three benefits the specification lists: added value, the ability to charge premium prices, and reduced price elasticity of demand.
The cost is that the spending is real and immediate while the return is later and uncertain. A business that sets building a brand as its objective is accepting a worse year now, and it needs to say so out loud — otherwise the same spending looks like a failure to hit the other two objectives.
Real Example: A supermarket own-label tin and a branded tin of the same beans, made in the same factory, sit on the same shelf at different prices. The gap is what the brand is worth to the shopper, and it took years of spending to open.
Exam Matters: An Assess (10 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a coherent, well contextualised chain of reasoning with balanced assessment leading to a supported judgement. Judging a brand-building objective means weighing what it costs this year against what it changes later.
The marketing mix is the set of decisions a business controls about its product, its price, how it promotes it and where it is sold, and the four have to agree with each other.
The marketing mix is the name for the decisions a business actually controls when it takes a product to market. There are four of them, and the rest of this section is one block each:
The reason they are taught as a mix rather than a list is that a decision in one constrains the others. Zola cannot charge $24 for a bottle sold from an unbranded carton in a discount shop, and it cannot sell a hand-finished bottle at $12 through a four-stage channel that takes most of the price. A mix "works" when a buyer meets the same message in all four.
That is also the trap in an exam answer. Asked to evaluate a marketing decision, a weak answer changes one element and stops. A strong one says what the change forces in the other three.
Real Example: A car sold as a budget runabout and advertised on price is a coherent mix. The same car with a luxury launch event and a premium showroom is not — buyers read the mismatch as a reason to distrust the claim.
Exam Matters: A Define (2 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires you to define the term. For the marketing mix that means the set of controllable decisions a business makes to sell a product, not a recital of the four names.
The product life cycle tracks a product's sales from launch to withdrawal in four stages, and its use is that the right price, promotion and place are different in each.
The product life cycle is a picture of what happens to one product's sales over its lifetime. It has four stages, and a business uses it to decide what the rest of the mix should be doing right now.
Two things are worth noticing on the curve. Profit is not sales: it lags behind, starts negative, and peaks before sales do, because the price is falling by the time the volume is at its highest. And the stages have no fixed length — a fashion item can pass through all four in a season while a staple food stays in maturity for decades.
Real Example: The physical video rental shop passed through every stage: a novelty, then a rapid climb, then a long plateau of high street branches, then a fall as streaming arrived. The stages were the same; only the speed differed.
Exam Matters: A Construct (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires you to draw an accurately labelled diagram, and says the type of diagram may be stated or left to you. A life-cycle curve needs both axes labelled, the four stages marked, and sales and profit drawn as separate lines.
An extension strategy is a change made to hold a product in maturity for longer, and it works by giving an existing buyer a new reason to buy rather than by finding a new product.
An extension strategy is what a business does when sales start to fall and it would rather not withdraw the product. The point is to push the decline back, and every version of it does that the same way: by changing something about the product or its mix without changing what the product fundamentally is.
Read that list against the mix in block 1 and the connection is the examinable part: an extension strategy is a change to one of the four elements, made deliberately at a particular point on the curve. It is cheaper than a new product because the development is already paid for, and it is limited for the same reason — there is only so much life in a product buyers have started leaving.
Real Example: A breakfast cereal sold for decades to children is re-promoted to adults as a late-night snack. The cereal is unchanged; the buyer and the occasion are new, and the decline is pushed back.
Exam Matters: An Analyse (6 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a brief chain of reasoning, explanation and/or justification, and does not include evaluation. Say which element of the mix changes, what that does to sales, and why the change reaches a buyer the product was losing.
The Boston Matrix places every product on two axes — the growth of its market and the share the business holds — so that four quadrants say what each product is for.
The Boston Matrix is a grid for looking at all of a business's products at once rather than one at a time. Each product is placed on two measures:
That gives four boxes, and the names are the tool's own:
The grid is worth having because those four boxes have different cash stories, which the next subsection uses. A business with nothing but question marks runs out of money; a business with nothing but cash cows has no future to spend it on.
Real Example: A household-goods group selling detergent, a new cordless vacuum, an old brand of soap and a growing range of cleaning wipes has one of each box on its shelves at the same time.
Exam Matters: A Construct (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires an accurately labelled diagram. A Boston Matrix needs both axes named and their direction right — growth up the side, share across the bottom — before any product is placed on it.
A product portfolio is managed by using the cash one product throws off to fund another, which is why a balanced portfolio matters more than any single product in it.
A product portfolio is simply every product a business sells, looked at together. The Boston Matrix is how it is read; managing it is what the business does next, and the whole of that is about where the cash goes.
Two judgements sit on top of that. A dog is not automatically withdrawn: it may cover its own costs, or be the reason a retailer stocks the rest of the range. And a business cannot fund every question mark at once — choosing which to back is the decision the grid exists to inform.
The link to the life cycle is direct: a product moves round the grid as its market matures, so a portfolio is balanced only if its products are at different stages.
Real Example: A software firm funds an unprofitable new product for years out of the licence income from an older one that almost sells itself. The old product is not the exciting one, and without it the new one would never have been built.
Exam Matters: An Assess (10 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires balanced, wide-ranging assessment leading to a supported judgement. Judging what to do with a product means weighing what it earns now against what the same money would do elsewhere in the portfolio.
A mass market strategy sells one product to as many buyers as possible, which makes each sale cheap to serve and each buyer easy to lose.
A mass market is one where the product is aimed at most buyers rather than a particular group. The strategy that goes with it follows from the volume: the product is standardised, the price is competitive, the promotion is broad, and the product is placed wherever most people shop.
The advantage is cost. Making one version in large numbers brings the cost of each one down, and a business selling into a mass market can accept a small margin on each bottle because there are so many of them.
The disadvantage is that everyone else can see the same opportunity. A mass market is crowded, buyers compare on price, and a business with nothing to distinguish it competes on the one thing it least wants to. Zola at $12 would hold 20% of its market — the largest share on its schedule — and would be earning $4 a bottle to do it.
Real Example: A supermarket own-label washing powder is a mass market product: one formulation, a low price, wide distribution and promotion that talks about value rather than identity.
Exam Matters: An Explain (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a brief explanation of cause or effect supported by details or examples. The cause is the volume; the effects are the lower unit cost and the pressure on price.
A niche strategy serves a small group whose needs the mass market does not meet, which allows a higher price and limits how far the business can grow.
A niche market is a small part of a larger market with a need the standard product does not answer. The strategy inverts every element of the mass market one: the product is specialised, the price is higher, the promotion is narrow and direct, and the product is placed where that particular group looks.
The advantage is the price. Buyers in a niche are choosing the product because it does something for them that the mass-market alternative does not, so price is not the first thing they compare, and the margin on each sale is wider.
Two limits come with it, and a good evaluation names both. The market is small, so there is a ceiling on sales however well the business does. And it is concentrated: a business depending on one group of buyers is exposed if their tastes move or a larger rival decides the niche is now worth entering.
Real Example: A maker of left-handed instruments serves buyers the mass manufacturers barely address. The buyers pay more and stay loyal, and there will never be very many of them.
Exam Matters: A Discuss (8 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires logical chains of reasoning in context, showing causes and effects, with a brief assessment showing awareness of competing arguments. A niche strategy has a clear benefit and two clear limits, which is the shape of that assessment.
Selling to a business and to a household are different strategies: one buys in quantity on a case that must be justified, the other buys one at a time for itself.
Business to business (B2B) means the customer is another business. Business to consumer (B2C) means the customer is the person who will use the product. The specification names both because the mix that works for one does not work for the other.
Zola sells both ways, and the same bottle carries two mixes: a negotiated price per case to a retail chain, and $20 on its own site. Block 7 shows what each does to the money Zola keeps.
Real Example: A coffee roaster supplies cafés by the sack on agreed terms and sells small bags from its own shop. Same coffee, two prices, two kinds of relationship.
Exam Matters: An Analyse (6 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a brief chain of reasoning, and includes interpretation if it is applied to given data. Name the type of customer, say what that changes about the mix, and follow it to the effect on the business.
A loyal customer is one who does not re-open the decision, which is worth more than the discount that bought them, because keeping a buyer costs less than finding one.
Customer loyalty is a buyer returning without shopping around again. The specification asks how businesses develop it, and the honest answer is that most of it is not the loyalty scheme.
What it is worth to the business is concrete: a returning buyer costs nothing to find, buys more often, and is less likely to leave over a price rise — which links straight to the pricing block, because the same loyalty that holds a buyer is what lets the business charge more without losing them.
Real Example: A coffee shop where the staff know the order is holding customers on something a rival cannot copy by launching a card. The card is the visible part; the recognition is what is actually working.
Exam Matters: An Evaluate (20 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires fully developed chains of reasoning and a perceptive conclusion proposing a solution or recommendation. Evaluating a loyalty scheme means asking what the business would have sold without it.
The design mix is the three-way trade-off between what a product does, how it looks and what it costs to make, and moving one of the three always moves another.
The design mix is the specification's name for the three things being decided whenever a product is designed:
The three pull against each other, and that is what makes it a mix rather than a checklist. A wider lid improves function and costs more to seal. A hand-polished finish improves aesthetics and slows the line. Zola's bottle costs $8 to make, and every design decision is finally a question about whether the buyer will pay for what it adds.
Which of the three leads is a strategic choice, not a design one. A budget product leads on cost and accepts less of the other two; a luxury product leads on aesthetics and can afford to; a piece of safety equipment leads on function and is not permitted to trade it away.
Real Example: A pen that writes reliably, feels solid and costs very little to make is a design success in all three. Most products get two of the three and choose which one to give up.
Exam Matters: An Explain (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a brief explanation of cause or effect supported by details. Naming the three elements is knowledge; saying what raising one does to another is the explanation being asked for.
Concern over resource depletion changes the design mix itself: waste minimisation, re-use and recycling become part of what the product must do, not an afterthought.
The specification asks how the elements of the design mix change to reflect social trends, and names concern over resource depletion first — the worry that materials are being used up faster than they are replaced. Three design responses come out of it:
Notice where these land in the design mix. Recyclability is a function requirement the product did not have before. A recycled finish is an aesthetic decision buyers now read as a signal. And all three touch cost — sometimes raising it, sometimes lowering it, because using less material is cheaper as well as cleaner.
For a business like Zola the trend is the market rather than a constraint on it: the whole product exists because buyers wanted to stop buying single-use bottles.
Real Example: A drinks maker that moves from a bottle bonded to a plastic sleeve to one printed directly on the glass has made a recycling decision inside the design, not a change to the label.
Exam Matters: An Analyse (6 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a brief chain of reasoning. Start from the trend, name the element of the design mix it changes, and follow it to what the business gains or gives up.
Ethical sourcing is a decision about where materials come from and how the people making them are treated, and it reaches the design mix through cost and through the claim.
Ethical sourcing is the second social trend the specification names under the design mix. It means choosing suppliers on how they operate as well as on price: the conditions people work in, what they are paid, and what the extraction of the material does to the place it comes from.
It reaches the design mix in two directions at once. It usually raises the cost of the materials, because the cheapest supplier is rarely the most scrupulous one. And it changes what the business may honestly say about the product, which is worth something in promotion and worth a great deal if the claim later turns out to be false.
The evaluation is about what the business is buying with the extra cost. A buyer who would have paid anyway is a cost with no return. A buyer who chose this product because of it is a sale that would not have happened. And the protection against a supply scandal is worth something whether or not any buyer ever notices.
Real Example: A clothing firm that publishes the list of factories it uses has made a sourcing decision it cannot quietly reverse. That is the cost of the claim, and also what makes the claim worth anything.
Exam Matters: A Discuss (8 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires logical chains of reasoning in context with a brief assessment showing awareness of competing arguments. The competing arguments here are the certain cost now against the uncertain return later.
Promotion is how a business tells buyers the product exists and gives them a reason to choose it, and the types differ in reach, cost and whether the effect can be measured.
Promotion is the element of the mix that carries the message. The specification asks for the types without prescribing a list, so the useful way to hold them is by what each one is good at:
The choice between them is about reach against precision, and about whether the effect can be measured. A discount code can be counted exactly; a sponsorship cannot. That does not make it worse — it makes it harder to defend.
You may meet these split into two groups labelled "above the line" and "below the line" in other textbooks. Those labels are not in this specification, and nothing in this course requires them.
Real Example: A running-shoe brand sponsors a marathon, advertises around the broadcast, posts the footage on its own channels and discounts last season's stock. Four types, one campaign.
Exam Matters: An Explain (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a brief explanation of cause or effect supported by details or examples. Name the type, say who it reaches, and follow that to the effect on sales or on the brand.
Branding decisions are about what the brand sits on and whose name it is, and each choice trades the reach of a shared name against the risk of sharing it.
A brand is the expectation a buyer already has before the product is picked up. The specification asks for the types of branding without listing them, and the two questions that actually separate them are these:
It can sit on one product, so that the product succeeds or fails on its own and a problem with it touches nothing else. Or it can sit on the whole range, so that a new product arrives already trusted — and so that one bad product damages every other. The second is cheaper to build and more dangerous to hold.
It can be the maker's name, which is what Zola sells under. Or it can be the seller's name, where a retailer puts its own name on goods made by someone else — usually at a lower price, because the buyer is not paying for the maker's brand. A manufacturer sometimes does both at once: its own brand on the shelf, and an unbranded version made for the retailer beside it.
Other textbooks label these individual, family, corporate and own-label branding. Those labels are not in this specification; the decisions behind them are what matters and what this course asks about.
Real Example: A food manufacturer sells soup under its own name and makes a near-identical soup for a supermarket to sell under the supermarket's name. The second earns less per tin and fills the factory.
Exam Matters: A Define (2 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires you to define the term. A brand is the expectation attached to a name — not the logo, and not the product itself.
A strong brand is worth having because it makes demand less sensitive to price, and the ability to charge more and the value added are both consequences of that one change.
The specification names three benefits of strong branding. They are usually listed as three separate things; they are better understood as one change with three consequences. Zola's own figures show it.
Before the brand was built, Zola's sales fell away steeply when it raised its price. After, they fall more gently. Both lines pass through $20 and 60,000 bottles, so the brand has not changed what Zola sells today — it has changed what a price rise costs.
That is why building a brand is an objective in its own right: it moves the profit-maximising price from $20 to $24.
Real Example: Two pairs of trainers of similar construction sell at very different prices in the same shop. The buyers of the dearer pair are not unaware of the cheaper one; the brand is what stops the comparison being decisive.
Exam Matters: A Calculate (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a calculation based on given data, with workings given. Added value is the selling price less what was bought in to make it, and the working is that subtraction.
A unique selling point is the one thing a buyer cannot get from the alternatives, and it is the foundation of a brand because it is the part a rival cannot simply copy.
A unique selling point (USP) is something about a product that competing products do not offer. Differentiation is the wider word: everything that makes buyers see this product as different from the others, whether or not any single feature is unique.
The specification puts USPs and differentiation first among the ways to build a brand, and the order is not arbitrary. Advertising, sponsorship and social media all carry a message; a USP is what there is to say. A business with nothing to differentiate it is paying to broadcast a claim its rivals could make word for word.
The hard part is that a USP has a life. A feature that is unique is copied; what is left afterwards is whether buyers still associate it with the business that had it first. That association is the brand, and it is why the ways to build a brand are taught together rather than as alternatives.
Real Example: A luggage maker whose lifetime guarantee is genuinely lifetime has a selling point that rivals can copy only by taking on the same cost. That is what makes it hold.
Exam Matters: A Define (2 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires you to define the term. A unique selling point is a feature competing products do not offer — the word doing the work is "unique", and a definition without it defines a feature.
The three vehicles build a brand differently: advertising states the claim, sponsorship borrows an association, and social media lets buyers carry the message.
After USPs, the specification names three ways of building a brand. Each does a different job, and a brand is usually built with all three.
The trade-off running through all three is control against credibility. The more completely a business controls a message, the more obviously it is the business speaking, and the less weight a buyer gives it. A recommendation from another buyer is believed precisely because the business could not write it.
For Zola the three are sequenced rather than chosen between: sponsorship of a regional running series puts the bottle where buyers already are, advertising states what it does, and the channel carries what buyers say about it afterwards.
Real Example: A sportswear brand sponsors an athlete, advertises the shoe they wear, and reposts what runners say about it. The sponsorship makes the advertisement plausible and the reposts make it credible.
Exam Matters: An Analyse (6 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a brief chain of reasoning without evaluation. Name the vehicle, say what it does to what buyers expect of the brand, and follow that to the effect on sales or on price.
Viral marketing, social media and emotional branding all move the message from something the business states to something the buyer carries or feels.
The specification names three ways branding and promotion have changed to reflect social trends. They are related: each moves the work away from the business asserting something.
Emotional branding is the deepest of the three. A product sold on function competes on function, and can be beaten by a better one. A product a buyer identifies with is not being compared on the same terms at all — which is the reduced sensitivity to price the last subsection measured.
The risk is symmetrical: a brand built on what buyers feel is damaged by anything that makes them feel differently, and that need not be about the product.
Real Example: A campaign built around a short clip people sent to each other reached an audience the business could not have bought. The clip was deliberate; the sending was not.
Exam Matters: An Evaluate (20 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a full awareness of the validity and significance of competing factors, leading to a conclusion proposing a recommendation. A promotion strategy resting on reach the business cannot control is a judgement about risk, not about cost.
Cost plus sets the price by adding a mark-up to what the product costs to make, which guarantees a margin on every sale and takes no account of what buyers would have paid.
Cost plus pricing starts from the unit cost and adds a percentage. The specification calls it "mark-up on unit cost", and the arithmetic is one line: price = unit cost × (1 + mark-up).
Zola's bottle costs $8 to make. Three mark-ups give three prices:
Those are the same three prices block 1 put beside Zola's sales, which makes the strength and the weakness visible at once. The strength is that every one of them covers the cost with a known margin, and it can be worked out for a range of hundreds of products without researching any of them.
The weakness is that nothing in the arithmetic looks at the buyer. The 150% mark-up gives $20, which happens to be where Zola's profit is highest — but the method did not know that, and a mark-up of 50% would have given $12 with the same confidence. Cost plus can only be as good as the mark-up it is handed.
Real Example: A builders' merchant with thousands of lines prices nearly all of them on a standard mark-up. Researching demand for every washer and bracket would cost more than the pricing could ever be worth.
Exam Matters: A Calculate (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a calculation based on given data, and says workings should be given. For cost plus, show the mark-up applied to the unit cost as well as the price it produces.
Skimming launches high and comes down; penetration launches low and goes up. They are opposite answers to the same question about what a launch is for.
Two of the pricing strategies the specification names are about launching, and they are mirror images.
The choice follows from what the launch is trying to buy. Skimming buys margin while the product is unmatched: it recovers development spending fastest and signals that the product is worth something. Penetration buys share: at $12 Zola would hold 20% of its market against 12% at $20.
Each has a characteristic failure. Skimming invites rivals in, because a high price is an advertisement for the opportunity. Penetration is hard to reverse: buyers recruited by a low price are the ones most likely to leave when it rises.
Real Example: A new television technology launches at a price only enthusiasts pay and is a fraction of it three years later. The early buyers were not overcharged; they bought being early, which is what they were paying for.
Exam Matters: A Discuss (8 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires logical chains of reasoning in context with a brief assessment showing awareness of competing arguments. Skimming against penetration is that assessment in its clearest form.
Competitive pricing matches the market and accepts it; predatory pricing prices below cost to remove a rival, which is a different act with a different risk.
Two more of the named strategies are about rivals rather than buyers, and the distinction between them is sharper than it looks.
Competitive pricing sets the price at or near what everyone else charges. It is what a business does when nothing distinguishes its product enough to hold a gap — the price is taken from the market rather than set. It is safe, it requires no research, and it hands the initiative to whoever moves first.
Predatory pricing sets the price below cost, deliberately, to make the market unprofitable for a rival until the rival leaves. The price is then raised. It is not a low price; it is a loss taken on purpose, which is why the business doing it has to be able to afford the loss for longer than the target can.
Two things follow. The strategy only pays if the rival actually leaves and stays out — otherwise the losses were spent for nothing. And it is restricted by competition law in many countries, because the buyer's gain is temporary and the loss of a competitor is not.
Real Example: A large retailer that prices one line below cost where a small local rival has opened, and at the usual price everywhere else, is showing the pattern that distinguishes predatory pricing from a sale.
Exam Matters: An Explain (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a brief explanation of cause or effect supported by details. The detail that separates these two is the relationship between the price and the cost.
Psychological pricing sets a price to change how large it seems rather than how large it is, which is why a penny can matter more than a dollar.
Psychological pricing chooses the price for the impression it makes. The familiar version is the price just under a round number: Zola's bottle at $19.99 rather than $20. The difference is one cent, and the first figure the buyer reads is different.
It works in both directions, which is the part students miss. A price set just under a round number says value. A price set at a round, high number says quality — a business that prices at forty dollars rather than thirty-nine ninety-nine is telling the buyer it is not competing on price.
The limit is what it can do. The penny changes how the price is read; it does not change what the buyer can afford or whether the product is worth having. It is a finishing decision, applied to a price that some other strategy has already chosen.
And it must agree with the rest of the mix. $19.99 on a bottle promoted as a premium product is a mismatch a buyer reads as a contradiction — which is block 1's point about the mix, arriving in the pricing block.
Real Example: A supermarket shelf of prices ending in 99 sits a few aisles from a delicatessen counter pricing in whole units. Both are psychological pricing; they are saying opposite things on purpose.
Exam Matters: A Define (2 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires you to define the term. Psychological pricing sets the price for how it is perceived — a definition that says only "ending in 99" describes one example of it.
The first three factors the specification names all ask the same question from different angles: how free is this business to set its own price?
The specification lists six factors that determine the most appropriate pricing strategy. This subsection takes the first three, and the next takes the rest. All six are about the same thing: how much room the business has.
Read the three together and they are one question asked three ways: differentiation is why buyers might not substitute, elasticity is the measurement of whether they do, and the level of competition is what they could substitute to. A strong answer on pricing connects them rather than listing them.
Real Example: A laboratory instrument with no direct substitute is priced on what it is worth to the buyer. A ream of plain paper is priced on what the shop across the road charges. The difference is the room.
Exam Matters: An Analyse (6 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a brief chain of reasoning, and includes interpretation where it is applied to given data. Take one factor, say what it does to the room the business has, and follow it to the strategy that becomes appropriate.
The remaining three factors are the ones that change over time: a brand is built, a product ages through its life cycle, and costs set the floor no strategy may go under for long.
The other three factors the specification names are the ones that move while the business is watching:
Two of these connect earlier blocks, which is the point of putting them last. The brand factor is why building a brand was worth naming as an objective; the life cycle factor is why the life cycle was taught before pricing.
The six together answer the question a pricing item actually asks: not "what strategies exist" but "which fits this business, now, with this product".
Real Example: A games console launched at a price few could justify sells for much less by the end of its life. Nothing about the manufacturing changed that much; the stage in the life cycle did.
Exam Matters: An Assess (10 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a well contextualised chain of reasoning with balanced, wide-ranging assessment leading to a supported judgement. Choosing a pricing strategy is that question: weigh the factors against each other and say which decides it here.
Selling online and comparison sites both make prices easier to compare, which narrows the room every pricing strategy in this chapter depends on.
The specification names two changes in pricing that reflect social trends: online sales and price comparison sites. They pull in the same direction, and understanding why is worth more than describing either.
Everything in this chapter follows from that. Price elasticity of demand rises when substitutes are easy to find, so the room the six factors describe gets narrower. Competitive pricing becomes closer to automatic. And the value of everything that is not price — a USP, a brand, a service — goes up, because it is the only thing a comparison site cannot sort on.
There is a second effect worth naming. Prices online can be changed continuously and at no cost, so a business can adjust them far more often than a printed price list ever allowed — and buyers can see the changes.
Real Example: An insurance market where most buyers now arrive through a comparison site sees products redesigned so that the headline price can be listed low, with the differences moved into what the cover excludes.
Exam Matters: An Evaluate (20 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires fully developed chains of reasoning showing a range of effects, with a perceptive conclusion proposing a solution or recommendation. The range here is what easy comparison does to price, to branding and to product design at once.
A distribution channel is the route a product takes from its maker to its user, and every stage on that route takes a share of the price the user finally pays.
Distribution is the "place" element of the marketing mix: how the product physically reaches the person who will use it. A distribution channel is the route it takes, and the specification names three by the number of stages on them.
The longest is the four stage channel: producer to wholesaler to retailer to consumer. Each stage buys from the one before and sells to the one after at a higher price, so the price grows along the route.
Zola keeps $2 a bottle — the least of any channel. What it buys with the rest is reach: a wholesaler supplies hundreds of small retailers Zola could never sell to one at a time, and it does the holding of stock and the chasing of payment as well.
Real Example: A confectionery maker reaches thousands of corner shops through wholesalers. Selling to each shop directly would cost more in order-taking and delivery than the shops are worth.
Exam Matters: A Define (2 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires you to define the term. A distribution channel is the route a product takes from producer to consumer — the definition is the route, not a list of the three types.
Removing a stage gives the producer more of the price and more of the work, which is the trade every shorter channel makes.
The other two channels the specification names are the four stage one with stages taken out.
The three stage channel is producer to retailer to consumer. Zola sells to the retailer at $12, the retailer sells at $19.20, and Zola keeps $4 — double what the four stage channel left it. In exchange Zola deals with each retailer itself.
The two stage channel is producer to consumer: Zola sells direct, at $20, and keeps $12. Nobody else takes a share, and nobody else does any of the work either — the site, the payments, the delivery and the returns are all Zola's.
Set the three side by side and one thing stands out. The four stage and three stage channels both put the bottle in front of the consumer at $19.20 — the same shelf price. What differs is how much of it reaches Zola: $2 against $4. The channel decision is rarely about what the consumer pays; it is about who does the work and who keeps the margin.
Real Example: A furniture maker that sells through showrooms and also runs its own website earns very different amounts on the same sofa, and does very different amounts of work for each sale.
Exam Matters: A Calculate (4 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a calculation based on given data with workings given. Applying a mark-up at each stage in turn is that working, and the answer is the price at the end of the chain.
The right channel follows from what the product needs at the point of sale and how many buyers there are to reach, which is why a business often runs more than one.
No channel is best. Which one fits depends on three things about the product and its buyers:
This is why businesses run several channels at once, and why the decision is properly a mix decision. Zola sells direct at $20 to buyers who come to it, and through retailers at $19.20 to buyers who would never have found it — and the two prices have to be close enough that neither insults the other.
That is the risk of multiple channels: a producer selling direct is competing with the retailers it also supplies. Price the direct channel too low and the retailers stop stocking it, which costs more reach than the direct sales were worth.
Real Example: A shoe brand that opens its own online store while still supplying sports shops has to price carefully in both. The shops can see the website, and they have other brands to stock.
Exam Matters: An Assess (10 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires a well contextualised chain of reasoning, balanced and wide ranging, leading to a supported judgement. A channel decision is margin against reach, and the judgement says which matters more for this product.
Distribution has changed by making short channels possible at scale, which lets a producer reach buyers directly without the retail network it once needed.
The specification's last requirement in this topic is changes in distribution methods. The change that matters is that the two stage channel — producer straight to consumer — became practical for products and businesses it was never available to before.
What has not happened is the disappearance of the longer channels. Retailers and wholesalers still do work the producer would otherwise pay for, and for a low-value product bought casually they do it more cheaply. The change widened the choice rather than settling it.
A short channel moves work as well as margin: a producer selling direct takes on the stock, the payments, the delivery and the returns.
Real Example: A mattress maker selling directly to buyers online took on warehousing, delivery and returns that furniture shops had handled for a century. The margin came with the work attached.
Exam Matters: A Discuss (8 marks, WBS11 Appendix 6) requires logical chains of reasoning in context showing causes and effects, with a brief assessment showing awareness of competing arguments. The competing argument here is the work that moves with the margin.
A marketing objective is a target for what the marketing is meant to achieve, stated so plainly that the business can tell afterwards whether it hit it.
Market share is the business's own sales as a percentage of the whole market's, so it rises only by taking bottles from a rival or by growing faster than the market does.